Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 36 Download : 20

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Organic Waste Bank is one of the efforts that can be implemented by the Pagar Alam City Government by
empowering the community to reduce the micro-scale greenhouse gas content of various unmanaged and untreated
organic waste in landfills. The organic waste produced can be processed into different valuable products, one of which
is for energy and agriculture. The active role of the community dramatically determines the success of reducing waste
that is wasted in landfills or open places. This journal review aims to determine the magnitude of the impact of physical
air quality on the implementation of organic waste banks to reduce micro-scale greenhouse gas emissions. Descriptive
analysis of organic waste characteristics, comparative analysis between before and after the implementation of organic
waste banks and economic analysis as a form of program evaluation that has a significant impact on the community.
The result of this study is a significant decrease in organic waste in various places in Pagar Alam City by up to 25%
because it has an economic value from community participation. In addition, greenhouse gases are controlled by up to
25% on a micro-scale. The implementation of organic waste banks in Pagar Alam City to reduce micro-scale greenhouse
gas emissions has a significant positive impact, so it can be applied in various areas that have similar problems

Keywords

Organic Waste Bank, Climate Change, Society Participation, Local Economy, Emission Reduction.

Article Details

References

  1. Alin Halimatussadiah. (2014). The Economic and
  2. Environmental Benefit from The Waste bank (Bank
  3. Sampah) in Depok Municipality, West Java. Policy
  4. Brief.
  5. https://www.lpem.org/the-economic-and-
  6. environmental-BENEFIT-from-the-waste-bank-bank-
  7. sampah-in-depok-municipality-west-java/
  8. Apriyana, Y., Susanti, E., & Ramadhani dan Elza Surmaini
  9. Balai Penelitian Agroklimat dan Hidrologi, F.
  10. (2016). Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on Food
  11. Crops Production in Dry Land and Design of
  12. Information System. 69–80.
  13. http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/ip.v25n1.2016.p69-80
  14. Aviaska Wienda Saraswati. (2023). Waste Bank A Solution
  15. to
  16. Pollution – Green Info. Green Info.
  17. https://greeneration.org/en/publication/green-
  18. info/waste-bank/
  19. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Pagar Alam. (2023). Kota Pagar
  20. Alam
  21. Dalam
  22. https://pagaralamkota.bps.go.id/
  23. Angka
  24. Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental
  25. Protection. (2020). Climate Change and Waste.
  26. Department of Energy & Environmental Protection.
  27. https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Reduce-Reuse-
  28. Recycle/Climate-Change/Climate-Change-and-Waste
  29. climate interactions. In Climate Change and Land (pp. 131
  30. .
  31. Cambridge
  32. University
  33. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.004
  34. Press.
  35. Jean Buzby. (2022). Food Waste and its Links to Greenhouse Gases
  36. and Climate Change. Food and Nutrition, Health and Safety.
  37. https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2022/01/24/food-waste-and-
  38. its-links-greenhouse-gases-and-climate-change
  39. Ling, M., & Xu, L. (2021). Incentivizing household recycling crowds
  40. out public support for other waste management policies: A long-
  41. term quasi-experimental study. Journal of Environmental
  42. Management,
  43. ,
  44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113675
  45. Moussa, R. R. (2022). The potential of using anaerobic digesters in
  46. developing countries. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 9,
  47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.10051
  48. Patrianti, T., Shabana, A., & Tuti, R. W. (2020). Government Risk
  49. Communication On Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction To
  50. Tackle
  51. Climate
  52. Change.
  53. https://doi.org/10.33299/jpkop.24.2.3416
  54. Pratiwi, A., & Hadinata, F. (2012). Manajemen Pengangkutan
  55. Sampah
  56. Kota
  57. Pagar
  58. –170.
  59. Alam.
  60. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/103992/2/RAMA_22201_530810
  61. _0025028101_01_front_ref.pdf
  62. Singhirunnusorn, W., Donlakorn, K., & Kaewhanin, W. (2012).
  63. Contextual Factors Influencing Household Recycling
  64. Behaviours: A Case of Waste Bank Project in Mahasarakham
  65. Municipality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36,
  66. –697. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.03.075
  67. Sondh, S., Upadhyay, D. S., Patel, S., & Patel, R. N. (2022). A
  68. strategic review on Municipal Solid Waste (living solid waste)
  69. management system focusing on policies, selection criteria and
  70. techniques for waste-to-value. Journal of Cleaner Production,
  71. ,
  72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131908
  73. David, E., & Niculescu, V.-C. (2021). Volatile Organic
  74. Compounds (VOCs) as Environmental Pollutants:
  75. Occurrence and Mitigation Using Nanomaterials.
  76. Public
  77. Health,
  78. ,
  79. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413147
  80. Farouk Banna, & Yara Salem. (2014, April 9). Organic waste
  81. as a valuable resource A call for action. Sustainable
  82. Cities.
  83. https://blogs.worldbank.org/sustainablecities/organic-
  84. waste-valuable-resource-call-action
  85. Fildza, Z. H. (2018). Analisis Konsentrasi Gas Metana (CH4)
  86. dan Gas Karbondioksida (CO2) dari Tangki Septik
  87. Pada Kegiatan Non Perumahan di Kelurahan Cupak
  88. Tangah,
  89. Kecamatan
  90. Pauh,
  91. Kota
  92. Padang.
  93. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:145998984
  94. Hadinata, F. (2013). Pelaporan, Evaluasi dan Pemantauan
  95. Rencana Aksi Daerah-Gas Rumah Kaca Provinsi
  96. Sumatera Selatan Sektor Pengelolaan Limbah
  97. (Domestik). www.greenclimateproject.org
  98. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Land–
  99. Tan, Z., Ren, Y., Han, J., & Chen, S. (2021). Evolving pattern and
  100. improvement path of China’s solid waste management policies.
  101. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment,
  102. (4),
  103. –368.
  104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2022.01.009
  105. Widayat, P., Hamuddin, B., & Syofya, H. (2021). Waste Bank: Model
  106. and Education of Organic and Non Organic Waste Processing
  107. in Riau Province. Proceedings of the First International
  108. Conference on Science, Technology, Engineering and
  109. Industrial
  110. Revolution
  111. (ICSTEIR
  112. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210312.062
  113. ,
  114. Xu, J., Huang, Y., Shi, Y., & Li, R. (2022). Reverse supply chain
  115. management approach for municipal solid waste with waste
  116. sorting subsidy policy. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 81,
  117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101180