Main Article Content

Abstract

Respiratory disorders often require intensive care management and empirical antibiotic therapy, which may lead to inappropriate use. This study aimed to evaluate the rationality of antibiotic use in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Pandega Pangandaran Regional Hospital in 2023 based on the Gyssens criteria and to measure the quantity of antibiotic consumption using the ATC/DDD method recommended by the World Health Organization. A mixed-methods design was applied, utilizing retrospective data from medical records. The Gyssens criteria were employed for qualitative evaluation, while the ATC/DDD method assessed quantitative consumption. Consecutive sampling was used to select ICU patients who received antibiotic therapy. The analysis revealed that 33.8% of antibiotic prescriptions were rational (category 0), while irrational use was identified in category IIIB (duration too short, 23.8%), category IVA (more effective alternatives available, 32.5%), and category IVC (less expensive alternatives available, 10.0%). Quantitative analysis showed that levofloxacin had the highest consumption rate (56.48 DDD/100 patient-days), followed by ceftriaxone (46.40 DDD/100 patient-days). These findings indicate that antibiotic prescribing practices in the ICU were not fully rational, primarily due to the absence of culture and sensitivity testing. Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship and incorporating microbiological results into prescribing decisions are essential to optimize antibiotic use and reduce resistance risks.

Keywords

Antibiotics; Rational use; Intensive Care; Gyssens; ATC/DDD

Article Details

References

  1. Gulo AF, Zulfa AA, Fitriyani A, Pondini DA, Kairunnisa S, Frianto D. Analisis Efektivitas Biaya Terapi Antibiotika Pada Penderita Gangguan Saluran Pernafasan Di Indonesia : Literature Review Article. Innov J Soc Sci Res. 2023;3(2):2743–55.
  2. Brahmani IAMS, Hartawan IGAGU. Prevalensi Kematian Pasien Di Ruang Terapi Intensif Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Sanglah Denpasar Periode Januari – Desember 2015. J Med Udayana. 2019;8(12):1–5.
  3. Hidayat H, Izzudin A, Santibudi S, Novpriani S. Perbandingan Pola Sensitivitas Bakteri Terhadap Antibiotik Di Ruang Icu Dan Ruang Rawat Inap Non Icu Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Dr. H. Abdul Moelok Bandar Lampung. J Ilmu Kedokt dan Kesehat. 2021;8(1):56–66.
  4. Kemenkes RI. Pedoman Pelayanan Kefarmasian Untuk Terapi Antibiotik. Kemenkes RI. 2011.
  5. Putri SA, Oktavilantikam DM. Evaluasi Rasionalitas Penggunaan AntibiotikPada Pasien Demam Tifoid Di Instalasi Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit “ X ” Indramayu Dengan Metode Gyssens. J Farm dan Farmakoinformatika. 2022;1(1):1–13.
  6. Hedi B, Fitri EY, Hikayati H. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Kejadian Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Di Ruang Icu Rsud Lahat. J Keperawatan Sriwij. 2017;4(1):1–13.
  7. Khasanah U, Tomi T, Kurniawati K, Kurnaedi A, Indawati I, Listiyani L, et al. Evaluasi Penggunaan Antibiotik Dengan Metode Atc/Ddd Pada Pasien Rawat Inap Di Rumah Sakit X Kabupaten Cirebon. Medimuh J Kesehat Muhammadiyah. 2023;4(2):95–100.
  8. Hayati T, Nur BM, Rayasari F, Sofian Y, Irawati D. Perbandingan Pemberian Hiperoksigenasi Satu Menit Dab Dua Menit Pada Proses Suction Terhadap Saturasi Oksigen Pasien Terpasang Ventilator. J Telenursing. 2019;1(1):67–79.
  9. Sukriya S, Manggau MA, Djaharuddin I. Evaluasi Penggunaan Terapi Antibiotik Empiris Terhadap Luaran Klinis Pasien Pneumonia Komunitas Rawat Inap. Maj Farm dan Farmakol. 2022;26(1):19–25.
  10. Irawati P, Apriana F, Hasan R. Pengaruh Posisi Tindakan Suction Terhadap Perubahan Saturasi Oksigen Pada Pasien Yang Terpasang Ventilasi Mekanik Di Ruang Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Heal Sci Pharm J. 2021;5(1):32–7.
  11. Menteri Kesehatan RI. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor Hk.01.07/Menkes/2147/2023 Tentang Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran Tata Laksana Pneumonia Pada Dewasa. 2023. p. 1–65.
  12. Wahyu P, Sagita D, Pratama S. Studi Penggunaan Antibiotik Berdasarkan ATC/DDD Dan Du 90% Di Puskesmas X Kota Jambi Periode 2017-2018. J Healthc Technol Med. 2020;6(1):26–32.
  13. Fatoni AZ, Rakhmatullah R. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Pada Pneumonia COVID-19. J Anaesth Pain. 2021;2(1):11–24.
  14. Fujishima S. Guideline-Based Management Of Acute Respiratory Failure And Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. J Intensive Care [Internet]. 2023;11(10):1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00658-3
  15. N ADK, Wulan AJ. Tatalaksana Terkini Bronkopneumonia Pada Anak di Rumah Sakit Abdul Moeloek. J Medula Unila [Internet]. 2017;7(2):6–12.
  16. Putra WA. Kajian Penggunaan Antibiotika Secara Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif Pada Ruangan Icu (Intensive Care Unit) Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Petala Bumi Provinsi Riau Tahun 2018 - 2019 [Internet]. Universitas Andalas. 2021.
  17. Kemenkes RI. Pedoman Umum Penggunaan Antibiotik [Internet]. 2013. p. 130–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005
  18. Perhimpunan Dokter Paru Indonesia. Panduan Umum Praktik Klinis Penyakit Paru dan Pernapasan. 2021. 30–61 p.
  19. Raini M. Antibiotik Golongan Fluorokuinolon: Manfaat Dan Kerugian. Media Penelit dan Pengemb Kesehat. 2016;26(3):163–74.
  20. Megawati SW, Dewi T, Nurohmat AD, Muliani R. Analisis Mortalitas Pasien di Ruang Intesive Care Unit (ICU). 2019;127–35. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consecutive_sampling
  21. Rachmawati H, Muktamiroh M, Hasmono D, Kusumaningtyas AP, Yunita SL, Yusetyani L. Evaluasi Penggunaan Antibiotik di ICU / HCU RSU Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Menggunakan Metode DDD dan Gyssens. J Kedokt Brawijaya. 2023;32(3):177–81.
  22. Nasution ES, Tanjung HR, Putri I. Evaluasi Pemberian Antibiotik Dengan Metode ATC/DDD Dan DU 90% Pada Pasien ICU Di PT Rumah Sakit Universitas Sumatera Utara. Pharmacia. 2023;70(4):1223–9.
  23. Dicky, A., & Wulan, A. J. Tatalaksana Terkini Bronkopneumonia pada Anak di Rumah Sakit Abdul Moeloek.2017;7(2).
  24. Krishnakumar, J., & Tsopra, R. What rationale do GPs use to choose a particular antibiotic for a specific clinical situation? BMC Family Practice. 2019;20(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1068-7